]]>

Saturday, August 20, 2005 

unnecessary acceptance of the bad in society

“All experience has shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed” – Declaration of Independence

In other words, The Declaration of Independence written to create the Republic of America identified that people will put up with many blood sucking parasites (poli-tics) rather than organizing the shift to real freedom.


 

You are needed! The race of your life has already started

You are needed! The race of your life has already started

Let me tell you a secret.

A secret of both influence as well as achievement.

Those with the greatest gap between their current reality and their desired reality suck in to them the greatest forces of potential from nature.

So what are you needed for? And how can you turn it into the biggest benefits and profits of a thousand lifetimes?

On your marks
Wake up!

Get set
Get clear and plan your work over the freedom decades

Go!
Work your plan without hesitation or procrastination

If you are new to all this and I am sounding weird, go to [ ] and Get Involved with getting the secrets of prosperity, influence, achievement, and freedom.

If you are not new to this and I am making sense, I invite you to

Waking up is something we must do each day, and I don’t mean in the physical sense. We must decide each day to consciously integrate with the big picture of our purpose and our life and the freedom decade’s opportunity of infinite lifetimes.

Ultimately, Internal Processing and Societal Processing blend into one pursuit. Effecting change in the world reduces to the revolution of your inner world.

To eliminate every aspect of irrationality, procrastination, self-dishonesty, is to rise as a Titan of value contribution and success in the world. Move on over Bill Gates, the real technology revolutionaries are hot on your tail.

Gates shot to dizzying heights of success in 10 years. He found a wave and rode it to the finish line.

Now it’s your turn within this final race in the War of Two Worlds.

The Value Destroyers of the Anticivilisation, be it in poli-tics (blood sucking parasites) or certain religious leaders (soul snatchers), or criminally minded losers.

The Value Producers and Creators of the rising Supercivilisation, be it in business, science or art.

To maintain this biggest and widest of perspectives is done not for big-headedness, but because of the supreme dynamic of influence and achievement in creating the biggest possible gap between current reality and desired reality.

You really can win it all, or you really will lose it all, sometime during these early 2000s. The 2008 elections will be one to watch. But the 2012 elections will be one where I believe Earth’s future hangs on the balance.

This represents my widest picture.

Please, what is yours?

What is your race during the decades of freedom?

Are you awake? Or does this all seem a bit kooky, or like its only a marketing ploy to you?

I really would like to know, for part of my greatest mission is to have others as significant as you can be, to grasp the self-responsibility that you can make a contributing difference in the developments of societal perspectives.

If you do hear the calling, then please, what are you doing about it?

How are you living? What are you working on? Do you wake each morning with the drive of a self-leader, ready to inject your intensity into your life and the life of others around you?

Or are you too drained by the suppressions, lack of resources, time constraints, and then procrastinations, living to die, at the end of the race, with the dust clouds of death catching up behind you as your pace resigns to a slow collapsing blank-out.

This is the distinction that faces me each and every moment.

What is your guiding and operating perspective system?

How can you improve it?
What slows you down?

How can you smash that?

Will you win it all or lose it all, perhaps by 2012, in your final race, of life and death, in this War of Two Worlds?

WhiteRabbit


 

LibertyForum post - exact principles or flexible growth?

At http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=mission&Number=4847&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=365&part= in post on Initial Vision John Deere on 12/11/01 said

1. Tired of talking: If we are to have an effect on the policies of this country, we need radical action, radical outreach, radical education, and radical PR. In short, we need a revolution. These forums have the potential to spark that revolution. We may fail or we may succeed. We can't justify not trying.

Here here!!!!! And how far has the forum come in the past 3 years? I’m new to the forum…

8. Independence: I envision our mission as being libertarian, and not Libertarian. Thus, we may choose to present our message as a message of liberty, peace, community, and common sense, rather than as a libertarian message.

Yesterday I would not have agreed. Today I think I do. Yesterday I would have said that the identification of solid principles is required for success and solid principles requires clear definitions and guide-posts of identity. Now I do not believe that. Today I believe that beliefs and ego-identifications limit the creation of our forthcoming ‘libertarian’.. shall I say ‘free’ super-world.

12/11/01 LsJohn said:
I'm afraid it's going to be difficult to achieve OWKs suggestion of enough generality to be inclusive of as many "others" as possible, yet specific enough to have meaning.

Difficulty is irrelevant if the task is worthy. But I don’t think LSJohn meant it in that way. My interpretation of LSJohn’s statement is that for a unified collective advancement of people to grow harmoniously, there must be some guiding beliefs/principles/characteristics, and that for any great advancement of the group, strong ideals etc must be held; which seems to negate the possibility of ‘generally accepted values’.

I perhaps do not want to attempt rationalisations of my thoughts at this time, as these ideas are new to me, but hopefully to open up the dialogue to the forum.

Consider that the very best thinkers and writers up until 25 years ago had a far smaller world than we do now. Communications and Internet have completely totally and irrevocably altered human knowledge.

Take writing for example. A book would have been hand written or typed far more linearly and with far less edits than today’s writings. Books that I have written and am working on have literally gone through hundreds of edits, and the information integration is so much more vast as everything is accessible and manipulatable to me in seconds.

What’s this got to do with a nameless freedom movement?

Well, after all is said and done, what’s left is what one has created.

Reems and reems of idealistic dogma can be constructed, equally in support of ‘libertarianism’ and equally against.

Do we still think that reason wins over irrationality?

Not if we look at history.

It’s almost boring to talk of philosophy and politics unless it directly contributes to something relevant to our instant gratification mode of living now.

What I have found works best for me is to read, learn, discuss, converse, listen, and judge, based on the value creations that I am involved with at that time or on a longer-time scale.

The essence of conscious life is control. To create is the most powerful dynamic of conscious ability.

Yes we want to create a ‘libertarian’ world, but we surely don’t want to talk about it forever.

Yet this is the path of least resistance for most people as they know not which direction to turn, as they are too asfixiated on labels, words, meanings, definitions, principles, concepts, beliefs, ideals, that they can not yet ground themselves into that natural state of creation.

Thus by arguing against the opposite spectrums of philosophy/politics, we actually perpetuate it all.

Aha!

I’ve just surprised myself with the connection between affirming one end of the spectrum of ideas to reinforcing the opposite end of the spectrum by that very opposing affirmation.

Are you seeing that?

I do not profess to have all the answers, but I do profess to see past the static dogma of obsolete ‘libertarian ideals’ as something that will attract the required masses for revolution.

Instead of ‘principled’ objectivism versus ‘wishy-washy’ pragmatism, think pragmobjectivism.

I would rather live in that golden super-world sooner than quarrel with all the ‘great unwashed’ until the cows [Hilary et al] come home in 2008 or 2012.

But ofcourse some of the readers on this forum will not be able to brook these ideas as their entire orientation is hell-bent on the identification of themselves with this notion of libertarian politics, rather than freedom; of anti-big-government rather than laissez-faire business; of political activism rather than prosperous lifestyle creation. Hence they will always return to the brick wall and a bruise the size of their pseudo-ego.

I believe that we are running out of time, but that this lends the greatest leverage of opportunity to finally tip the scales to enduring freedom.

I believe we need to look past our cloaks and daggers of words and beliefs, and instead enter an optimistic life of creativity.

Perhaps you want to read more of my projects via http://supercivilisation.net and http://societal.supercivilisation.net

If you want to read my take on what must be done, I suggest you read all on http://societal.supercivilisation.net/societal_processing_freedom_publications.htm


 

stupidity disease? - commuters after london bombs

There's been talk of the high spirits of Londoners in the media. I do wonder if it's more plain stupidity, numbness, and disregard for consideration of personal safety...

"With tensions high, part of Charing Cross Road had been shut off, apparently because of a suspect package in the street.

"As he directed people down side streets, one police officer sighed:

"I've been telling them but after all that's gone on today they still want to go through."


Monday, August 01, 2005 

Bobaholic - self-destructive acceptance

I used to have a colleague that reminded me of wallace and grommit. The
way he moved was so similar to the cartoon figures.

He had self-esteem problems, paranoia which he told me of and that he was
getting counciling for. I could also tell from his posture that he had
digestive problems. And it wasn't occasional, it was constant.

His stomach protruded, and this helped the characterisation from that cartoon.
And these problems highlighted his terrible diet to me.

Often at the investment bank would be chocolates that the employees could
take from, brought by holidays, by bankers, etc.

Lets call him Bob, I would become mesmerised watching him break off a slab
of chocolate chuckling away talking to colleagues, waddling like a penguin
with his digestive problem inflamed belly, as per wallace and grommit
movements, and apparently, supposedly, completely oblivious to the
self-destruction of his body, his mind, his spirit, his self.

Chewing up and gulpging down the pieces of chocolate, barely savouring the
taste, but simply shoveling enough to get some of the taste in quick
consumption of sugar laiden metabolism destroying snacks.

I figured that he would never progress much in terms of career. Oh sure,
he could go up a few notches, but he seemed to have no great vision or
drive. Anything for a 50p per hour pay raise I think was his motivation.

I imagined him in his 40s... carrying around a bigger belly, the same
jolly laugh but now more cynical, less camouflaged, infact quite accepting
of his self-destruction. And perhaps a beer, package of crisps, and his
favourite chocolate bar ready for him at his new but similar work place.

Music gets him through the day. In fact music is getting him through
life. Albeit probably a short one as the digestive problems are leading
to other complications.

He is experiencing sharp pains now running up his legs, through his
abdomen, and up into his chest. Oh, and another thing that gets him
through his life: good ol' tasty slabs of chocolate.

Oh the pleasures in life.